Where to start... There's so much stuff to say... Ok. Well, I shall work my way back in a chronologically and psychologically reversed manner.
We went with nico, Janik and
mousme to
fearsclave's ranch yester and we had a hell of a blast. Litteraly. But now if I go and say I had a "blast" litterally, you will ask, I guess, how and how come. (Then again, maybe you won't and will just think : nuh-uh. I don't give a damn. But then again, that would defy the whole purpose of blogging, wouldn't it? rethorical question.)
Now, in order for my to explain that I had a blast, I'd have to explain we went and learned, Janik, Nico and I, how to operate in a vaguely, supposevly kinda-not-overly-blatantly-ridicuoulousl
y dangerous manner a firearm. The fearsrifle and the fearspumpactionshotgun (
Alice, I think). And what's even - and far, far - worst, I can honestly say, as I feared, I enjoyed it to some significant extent.
Which is bad, but foreseeable.
Now, if you know me you may say (actually, you may say it even if you don't know me, who am I to interfere?) YOU,
Ulvain, you went to SHOOT? and ENJOYED it?
And explaining this takes two things. 1) nuances and 2) context.
1) The NuancesI always knew - and that's one of the things I had already discussed several times with
fearsclave that marksmanship and the such might be quite enjoyable. Thinking it's something one can feel some "fun" while doing doesn't change my views on firearms in general. Which are too complexe to expose here, and I don't want to start the debate yet, yet, yet again. It's precisely because it's enjoyable that it's dangerous. If it's enjoyable, people *want* to do it. and they do. Which results in more usage. Which results in more carelessness, more accidents, more of it being common to own one or several guns, more of a natural tendency in going for more "firepower" etc. I'm not pro-gun, not becomming pro-gun, not considering guns are "not that bad after all", not asking - on the very harsh contrary - for any softening of gun controlling, not anything of the sort. But considering the context, I believed it was necessary that I learn how to operate a rifle with minimal efficiency if needs be.
2) The ContextNow that's a tough one. Explaning the general psychological context my brother and I are in, requires explaning the results of our few last weeks to a month of heavy research on
peak-oil. I won't go through all my research, but here are the main sources and references to 1) know what I'm talking about and 2) try to prove it's not true through more "credible or solid" sources, which I and all the ones I talked to cuoldn't manage to do despite our frantic efforts.
Source : Matt Savinar, young californian lawyer with a phenomenal research on the topic
www.lifeafterpeakoil.com
http://files.meetup.com/40852/The%20Oil%20Age%20Is%20Over.pdf
Michael Ruppert, un ex-CIA agent, founder of www.fromthewilderness.com
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XplJvk46Ses
Matthew R. Simmons, "energy advisor" to George W. Bush (bio :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matthew_Simmons
http://www.simmonsco-intl.com/research.aspx?Type=msspeeches
Noam Chomsky - http://www.chomsky.info/
http://www.energybulletin.net/5489.html
http://peakenergy.blogspot.com/2005/04/chomsky-on-peak-oil.html
General info:
http://www.hubbertpeak.com/ - On Hubbert's Peak
http://www.theoildrum.com/ - News site on the world of oil
http://www.energybulletin.net/ - News on energy
http://eia.doe.gov/ - Energy Information Administration (US)
http://iea.org/ - International Energy Agency
Basically, read all this, and you too will think that in a not that distant future... knowing how to catch, kill, prepare and cook a rabbit might come in handy... Not to mention the "hoards of armed hungry suburbanites" that
fearsclave affections so much ;)
Any questions? :)
Tags: fearsclave, firearms, guns, oil crash, oil peak, survival
Current Mood:
gloomy